Press Release: Youth-Led Public Art Installation Highlights Need for Family Conversations

make art space public art stoppna

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (July 1, 2014) Youth leaders in Chicago are invited to participate in a public art installation called “Make/Art/Space.” The project will be led by youth from the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health (ICAH) in partnership with Affinity Community Services, University Church and the Jane Addams Hull House Museum to explore how families talk about sexuality through public art. This public art initiative hopes to stimulate complex conversations connected to issues around sexuality, age, race, gender, and other vital parts of life and identity.

Over the past 6 months, Chicago youth leaders have collected stories from their peers across the state of Illinois about family-supported sexuality conversations. In the third week of July, ICAH’s Make/Art/Space summer program will help youth artists shape these narratives into murals, dioramas, sculpture and visual poetry. Their artwork will use the exact words from storytellers in order to amplify the real life narratives from youth.

The storytelling project was created in response to Illinois’ forced Parental Notification for Abortion Law (PNA), which requires medical providers to notify an adult family member of any person under the age of 18 seeking an abortion. ICAH fully supports conversations between youth and their adult family members about sexuality. We also recognize that when this isn’t safe for youth, they need the full range of confidential, safe, and legal reproductive options. Since forced notification mandates a conversation between youth and their given families about sex and reproductive services, we gathered both positive and negative experiences of talking to families about sexuality. The goal is to inspire a legislative repeal for this dangerous law.

The public is invited to join in for one or both of the following events to view youth-created artwork, explore family-centered conversations about sexuality, and eat! The first event will happen in partnership with Affinity Community Services and University Church on July 15. Join us for a second installation on the front porch of the Hull-House Museum on July 16 as a part of the museum’s Porch Project, a summer-long effort to engage in community on porches, stoops and sidewalks throughout the city.

Tuesday, 7/15- 3-4 PM 
University Church, Hyde Park
5655 S University Ave, Chicago, 60637

Wednesday, 7/16- 3-4 PM
Jane Addams Hull House, UIC Campus
800 S Halsted St, Chicago, 60607



Nikki Zaleski, Youth Education Coordinator

Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health | (312) 427-4460 ext. 234


map showing 23 States have forced parental involvement laws but little or no sex ed

5 Myths About Youth-Targeted Abortion Laws

by Yamani Hernandez

Article published June 27, 2014 on RH Reality Check

“Parental consent and notification laws are built on a series of myths about young people, families, abortion, and the judicial process.

State laws vary between requiring medical providers to notify adult family members to, at the extreme, requiring that two parents provide notorized consent before a young person can access abortion care.Currently, 38 states have mandated parental consent or notification laws. With those laws come a series of dangerous misconceptions that are creating barriers to health care for youth instead of increased resources and information.

Myth #1: “Parental involvement sounds like a good idea to me.”

In reality: Most young people already go to a trusted adult for support… Read Entire Article on RH Reality Check

Sign the Petition to Oppose forced Parental Notification in Illinois!

It’s All Connected: Youth Homelessness, Health Access, and the Parental Notification of Abortion Law in Illinois

Advocacy Day 2014 | #StopPNA Parental Notification of Abortion L

By Lara Brooks

Reposted from Amplify Your Voice & Advocates for Youth Blogs.

Lara S. Brooks is a Chicago-based youth worker fighting for transformative justice, queer and trans youth spaces, a never-ending supply of harm reduction options, and holistic health access for youth experiencing homelessness. Brooks works with the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health as a youth rights advocate.

During the first week of April 2014, youth leaders rallied at the Illinois state capitol to advocate for their reproductive rights and generate awareness about the dangers of the Parental Notification of Abortion Law (PNA). The Illinois PNA law requires that any person under 18 years of age seeking access to abortion services must have an adult family member (someone who is a parent, legal guardian, grandparent, or step-parent who lives with the young person) notified at least 48 hours before a medical provider can perform the abortion. There are similar laws in 38 states around the US.

As a long-time youth worker, sexual assault counselor, and former director of a youth center, I know that young people, navigating complex realities and complicated systems, are making informed and thoughtful decisions about their bodies—something that the very premise of PNA erases altogether. As an advocate and youth ally, I resist that erasure. At the recent youth rally in Springfield, I witnessed how powerful the voices and stories of youth can be when lifted up as part of policy conversations around the reproductive rights of youth.

The dangers of PNA, in combination with existing barriers to abortion access, disproportionately impacts youth who are in danger of or currently experiencing homelessness, housing instability, violence, and neglect. Based on my experiences working with young people, I know the trauma, danger, and crisis induced by PNA directly exacerbates violence, neglect, and homelessness. For already unstably housed young people, parental notification of abortion laws are just as dangerous as laws in other states that require written consent.

Most significantly, PNA does nothing to address the systemic or structural roots of this critical question: What are the lived realities of many young people in Illinois that make it unsafe to inform PNA’s list of approved adults and guardians in the first place?

I believe responding to the harms of PNA demands an intersectional, holistic response that includes all of us—young people, families, communities, youth workers, adult allies, healthcare providers, health educators, parents, and organizers. Despite barriers to comprehensive sexual health information and accessible healthcare, young people create powerful relationships within their communities, grow life-saving chosen families, and build critical, supportive and trusting relationships with extended family members, educators, youth workers, counselors, and other caring adults. Young people are actively striving to reduce their isolation in ways that are inspiring. As a youth worker, I witness this type of resilience every day.

The Reproductive Justice Movement that I want to be a part of builds its base by connecting and centering the real, lived experiences of young people. It connects to and learns from Environmental, Disability, Healing, and Health Justice Movements. It intersects with Racial, Queer and Trans* (transgender, gender variant, gender non-conforming, and gender questioning), Transformative Justice, and Economic Justice Movements. No one is disposable and solutions support both immediate and long-term goals and needs. For example, how are we holistically connecting struggles for reproductive health access with Trans* health access? How does Reproductive Justice intersect with state violence, policing, and discrimination? Which clients and patients are the most disposable in our current healthcare systems? How does a sex- and body-positive, gender-affirming, and trauma-informed health care system benefit all of us?

Structural and intersectional responses to reduce the harms of PNA, in this moment, include all of us.  Reproductive Justice pushes me to critically question and complicate definitions of self-determination, choice, and consent. And, at the same time, Reproductive Justice implores us to transform the conditions which may lead to increased violence for a young person seeking reproductive health options and abortion access.

I know we can do better and show up for young people by:

  1. Complicating narratives about consent and self-determination by creating spaces that allow young people to share their real lives in their own words.
  2. Listening to, trusting, and believing young people.
  3. Acknowledging that young people may be taking care of and supporting (emotionally, financially) the same family members that they are forced to inform when seeking abortion access.
  4. Increasing access to safe, gender-affirming, sex-positive, trauma-informed, and body-positive healthcare and health education.
  5. Creating alternative health-focused projects, organizations, and clinics with values in relationship building and harm reduction. Many of us feel a sense of disposability as staff, patients, and/or clients within health-focused organizations, medical institutions, and clinics.  Let us continue to build models that meet our needs and fight for our whole lives.
  6. Learning about legacies and histories of sexual and reproductive health resiliency.
  7. Educating our communities about ACLU’s Judicial Bypass Coordination Project, a strategy for reducing the harms of PNA right now.
  8. Centering the health priorities of Queer and Trans* young people of color, youth with disabilities, and undocumented youth in our reproductive justice and health access efforts.
  9. Taking part in efforts to end youth incarceration and the school-to-prison pipeline.
  10. Recognizing that laws like the PNA are an extension of the carceral state, one that values punishment-based systems and incarceration to “solve” community “problems” instead of restorative justice and community accountability practices. PNA may serve as a tool to discriminately punish young people most impacted by economic and housing injustices.
  11. Incorporating Healing and Disability Justice—and the ways our bodies have experienced intersecting forms of violence (institutional, state, individual, generational, and family violence) into our conversations, workshops, and writings about sexual health, abortion, intimacy, disabilities, youth incarceration, and more.
  12. Increasing opportunities for young people to access basic needs, including safer sex supplies, in accessible, non-judgmental spaces.
  13. Providing employment, educational, and authentic leadership development opportunities to young people—particularly young people of color, youth impacted by state systems like juvenile detention, foster care, and group homes, youth with disabilities, undocumented youth, and LGBTQ young people.

The Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health, ACLU of Illinois, and Chicago Abortion Fund are raising awareness with the support of Advocates for Youth in a campaign called #StopPNA. Follow the #StopPNA campaign on Twitter & Instagram where you can join in with your voice and stories.

News! Montana AG barred from defending abortion consent laws

“These laws are not only bad health policy, but also clear violations of young Montanans’ constitutional rights.”

Reposted from by Charles Johnson

HELENA – A Helena district judge has blocked the state from defending two state laws that require minors to obtain parental consent before obtaining abortions.

Planned Parenthood of Montana, which challenged the laws, claimed victory Tuesday. A spokeswoman said the group now will ask District Judge Jeffrey Sherlock of Helena to permanently enjoin the two laws to stop them from being enforced.

Attorney General Tim Fox, representing the state, intends to appeal Sherlock’s decision to the Montana Supreme Court, a spokesman said.

Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit in May 2013 challenging the Montana Parental Consent for Abortion Act passed by the 2013 Legislature. It required a female who is younger than 18 years old to obtain a notarized consent from a parent before getting an abortion.

The 2013 law had the effect of repealing Legislative Referendum 120, which Montana voters passed by a 71 percent to 29 percent margin in 2012. That law had prohibited a pregnant female who is younger than 16 years old from obtaining an abortion without having notified a parent of her intent.

Planned Parenthood argued that the laws violated Montana’s constitutional right to privacy, the right to equal protection and the rights of individuals not adults.

In his ruling Friday, Sherlock determined that the issue had already been decided in a 1999 ruling in the Wickland case by District Judge Dorothy McCarter, a former Helena judge now retired.

McCarter’s Wickland decision struck down as unconstitutional a state law requiring parental notification, or a court order, for a minor seeking abortion.

McCarter’s decision, Sherlock said, found that the compelling interests advanced by the state in support of parental consent laws “are not sufficient to support the violation of constitutional rights of a pregnant minor seeking an abortion.”

The state did not appeal the 1999 decision, and the law later was permanently enjoined.

In the 2013 challenge, Sherlock denied the state’s motion seeking a ruling determining that “collateral estoppal” doesn’t apply in this case.

Black’s Law Dictionary explains collateral estoppal this way: “When an issue of ultimate fact has been determined by a valid judgment, that issue cannot be again litigated between the same parties in future litigation.”

“These concerns of the state are certainly legitimate,” Sherlock said. “However, there was nothing preventing the state form appealing the Wickland decision.”

As a result, he denied the state’s motion for a summary judgment and granted Planned Parenthood’s request for summary judgment in its favor.

“The court rules that the state of Montana is collaterally estopped from asserting that the compelling interests set forth in either the legislative referendum or the Parental Consent for Abortion Act justify the infringement on the constitutional rights of a minor seeking an abortion,” Sherlock said.

In response, Martha Stahl, CEO and president of Planned Parenthood of Montana, said,

“These laws are not only bad health policy, but also clear violations of young Montanans’ constitutional rights.

Stahl said the question is whether Fox “will accept the ruling that protects the right and health of the young women of Montana, or force the state to spend more resources in litigating laws held unconstitutional more than a decade ago.”

Fox’s spokesman John Barnes said an appeal is certain.

“More than 70 percent of Montana voters believe parents should be involved in their children’s life-changing decisions, which is why Attorney General Fox will continue to defend Montanans’ right to direct democracy through the voter initiative process by appealing this District Court decision,” Barnes said.